From this definition it is possible to begin to understand that this type of discourse does not match our reality , and that meritocracy privileges those who have already had opportunities, that is, those who were born rich. To better understand this subject, let’s talk a little about the scenario of the Brazilian population and understand why meritocracy is a fallacy and does not work in companies. Meritocracy in theory The word meritocracy has its etymological origin in Latin and also in Greek. Merit comes from the word meritum , and cracia comes from Greek, which means power, which we can define as “power of merit” .

What we can identify with this terminology

The word meritocracy defines, as the basis for professional success, individual effort and dedication. Because only through individual work is it possible to “move up” in the career. Meritocracy works with hierarchical positions , where the higher the position, the Job Seekers Database more the individual has worked to be there. That is, it is necessary to have the best education, the best technical and professional profiles that are specific to that area. This system is widely used in private companies as a way of recognizing good performance. They value professionals through salary increases, offering higher positions and also rewarding them in other ways, such as trips.

Meritocracy is used to motivate employees

That they are always striving for the best. But I ask you, how can we have a meritocratic system if we don’t start from the same place? That more than 50% of the population China Phone Number List does not have access to quality education . Therefore, which is the basis for being able to “compete” for a place. In this video. The from Growth Marketing, and his guest Reury Fidelis , address the topic succinctly with current and essential issues for the business environment. To delve deeper into this topic, let’s move on to the next topic to understand the social inequality that plagues our country, and how meritocracy is something only for those who have had better opportunities.